There is a huge body of
evidence showing the positive impact of Professional Learning Communities, so let’s take a second to
restate some of the proven advantages here.
Effective Professional Learning Communities serve a dual
purpose. First of all they center their full attention on student learning.
By shifting the focus from “I taught it” to “my students learned it”, Professional Learning Communities
have “contributed to high performance by:
Ø Ensuring that all
students learn
Ø Fostering a culture of
collaboration
Ø Focusing on results”
(Fullan 2005)
Secondly, by engaging
teachers in ongoing dialogue and discussion around student work and by
providing job-embedded professional development, PLCs have had a positive
impact on schools by:
Ø "Developing teachers’
skills
Ø Improving the quality
of ongoing interaction among staff
Ø Achieving a coherent
focus
Ø Mobilizing resources
Ø Developing school
leadership" (Newmann, King, & Youngs 2000 in
Fullan 2005)
In looking at the above list it is easy to see that PLCs not only
help the students, but they also help the educators. In fact, “recent
research shows that the kinds of professional development that improve
instructional capacity display four critical characteristics; they are:
Ø Ongoing
Ø Embedded within a context so that they meet the specific needs of a
particular setting
Ø Aligned
with reform initiatives
Ø Grounded
in a collaborative and
inquiry-based approach to learning” (Senge 1990; Knapp 2003 in Annenberg 2004).
All of the above factors are part of Professional Learning Communities.
In addition, research says, “effective professional development to
improve classroom teaching concentrates on high learning standards and on
evidence of students’ learning. It mirrors the kinds of teaching and
learning expected in classrooms. It is driven fundamentally by the needs and
interests of participants themselves, enabling adult learners to expand on
content knowledge and practice that is directly connected with the work of
their students in the classroom” (Corcoran 1995; Darling-Hammond and
McLaughlin 1995; Little 1988; Elmore 2002 in Annenberg 2004). Again, we are
describing PLCs.
Therefore, according to the research, along with increased student
achievement, Professional Learning Communities are one of the best ways to engage in effective school
improvement and productive staff development. As
Schmoker says, “We can no longer afford to be innocent of the fact that
“collaboration” improves performance” (Schmoker 2004). Stiggins and Chappuis agree
with him saying, “When teams commit to shaping the ideas into new classroom
practice, reflecting on the results, and sharing the benefits with each
other, professional growth skyrockets. Teams reach their ultimate goal of
changing classroom assessment practices in specific ways that benefit
students” (Stiggins & Chappuis Winter 2006).
The National
Staff Development Council goes on to explain that “staff development that has as its goal
high levels of learning for all students, teachers, and administrators
requires a form of professional learning that is quite different from the
workshop-driven approach. The most powerful forms of staff development occur
in ongoing teams that meet on a regular basis...for the purposes of
learning, joint lesson planning, and problem solving. These teams...operate
with a commitment to the norms of continuous improvement and experimentation
and engage their members in improving their daily work to advance the
achievement of school district and school goals for student learning” (NSDC).
Thus professional learning communities become not only a means to improve
student achievement and increase student learning, but they are also the
most effective way to engage the staff in professional development
themselves.
Page Menu Reference
Page
Contact
Us