In order to
understand the importance of data-driven decision-making on our school
improvement and student achievement efforts, imagine that we are told we
have to reach a place called Volinia by nightfall or we will lose
everything. We have no idea where it is. Yet, we are told we can’t use any
maps or data to locate it, so we start out driving aimlessly in hopes of
reaching our destination, but the chances are slim to none that we will find
it on time. The same is true if we start our school improvement or student
achievement efforts without doing a thoughtful data analysis. “Statistical data on school programs and student performance
provide educators with our only real evidence of the success or failure of
educational programs. Data ‘identifies the link between teaching practices
and student performance so that high achievement levels can be obtained’
(Miller 2000 qtd. in Wade 2001)”.
Mike Schmoker advocates
keeping this focus narrow. As he points out,
"There is a marked difference
between vague, well-intentioned improvement efforts and carefully targeted,
goal-oriented, short-term efforts aimed explicitly at getting measurable,
substantive results quickly” (qtd. in Sparks Winter 2000). For this to
happen our decision making efforts need to be more than data-driven; they
need to be inquiry-based as well.
There is a
substantial body of research pointing to the fact that inquiry-based
data-driven decision making has a powerful effect on the school
improvement/student achievement processes
(Aldersebaes,
Potter, & Hamilton 2000;
Barnes 2004;
Bernhardt 2000;
Bernhardt 2003; DuFour 1997;
Feldman, &
Tung 2001; Feldman, Lucey, Goodrich, & Frazee February 2003; Killion &
Bellamy Winter 2000;
Love 2004; Marzano 2003; Protheroe Summer, 2001;
Rallis & MacMullen June
2000; Scherer February 2003; Schmoker 1999; Wade 2001;
Wellman &
Lipton 2003).
Killion and Bellamy found
that:
“School-based data analysis
strengthens school improvement efforts. Data analysis increases the
schools’ use of data and strengthens improvement efforts…(by allowing the
schools)… to answer their questions about programs and student achievement.
As a result, their school improvement efforts are more on target. Schools no
longer select arbitrary goals, but rather identify core problems and set
goals to align with them. Schools slow down their actions and are not
rushing to implement untested strategies to solve problems. Instead, they
research possible interventions and conduct mini-pilots to determine which
intervention are most appropriate for their students and staff. Schools are
more thoughtfully analyzing formative data to make mid-course corrections
and to avert potential problems with implementation” (Killion & Bellamy
2000).
This was further born out by
Wade’s findings that when teachers “acknowledged and accepted (data), data
could lead to the formulation and implementation of corrective courses of
action that could solve problems and meet a school’s goals. Once
improvement strategies were under way, educators could continue to analyze
the data to monitor and refine their efforts” (Wade December 2001).
Thus “there is a growing body
of evidence that the use of high-quality, targeted assessment data, in the
hands of school staff trained to use it effectively, can improve
instruction” (Protheroe, Summer, 2001) and lead to greater student
achievement—which is our shared end goal—the one thing at which all of our
efforts are aimed.
As Feldman and Tung point
out, “Through program improvements brought about by data analysis, a higher
level of achievement can also be expected of students. In some cases,
students have even begun emulating the practices of data inquiry they see
their teachers modeling, conducting their own student surveys and analyses”
(qtd. Wade 2001). Given all of this, it is little wonder that “using data
to drive improvement was identified as a key to success in a report
developed by the National Education Goals Panel” (Rothman 2000, qtd. in
Protheroe Summer, 2001).
Therefore, inquiry-based
data-driven decision making is an important tool for us to use as we
investigate the relationships that exist between the way things are now and
how we would like them to be. It helps us to uncover our own assumptions and
deal with them in a positive non-punitive way. It lets us focus on the same
data sets and come to a collective agreement on what the data mean. It
allows us to agree to a course of action and be honest about what it will
take to turn that plan into a reality
(Wellman &
Lipton 2004). It helps direct and structure the types of professional
development that will most impact student achievement (National Staff
Development Standards:
Data-Driven).
However, “if data are to
provide meaningful guidance in the process of continuous improvement,
teachers and administrators require professional development regarding data
analysis, designing assessment instruments, implementing various forms of
assessment, and understanding which assessment to use to provide the desired
information. Because the preservice preparation of teachers and
administrators in assessment and data analysis has been weak or nonexistent,
educators must have generous opportunities to acquire knowledge and skills
related to formative classroom assessment, data collection, data analysis,
and data-driven planning and evaluation” (National Staff Development
Standards:
Data-Driven).
By “learning to incorporate data analysis as a regular part of
their professional activity, teachers become more reflective about their
teaching practices, less reactive, less willing to accept easy answers, and
more open-minded to solutions based on the data they gather. As a whole, the
school assumes a more professional and civil culture of inquiry, in which
"teachers share with each other important questions and ideas related to
teaching and learning" (Feldman and Tung 2001 qtd. in Wade 2001). In all
these ways, inquiry-based data-driven decision making helps make our student
achievement goals a reality. Therefore, “the inquiry cycle is an integral
and natural process of professional practice for any good teacher or
principal. (By using it) professional educators make decisions that are
student-centered and knowledge-based. (Through it, we use) reflective
inquiry…to foster effective learning” (Rallis & MacMullen June 2000) for all
students. Thus inquiry-based data-driven decision-making is at the core of
learner-centered schools.
(Jessup,
Sally. (2007). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Data-Driven Decision-Making on
Student Achievement. The Educational Partners LLC. Online)